"The Khilji dynasty was named after a village in  
 Afghanistan. Some  historians feel that they were Afghans, but Bharani 
  and Wolse Haig have  mentioned in their accounts that the rulers from 
  this dynasty who came  to India had temporarily settled in 
Afghanistan,   but were originally  Turks". 
 
"The Khiljis were a Turkish tribe but having been long domiciled in    
Afghanistan, and adopted some Afghan habits and customs. They were    
treated as Afghans in Delhi Court". 
 
The three sultans of the Khalji dynasty were noted for their    
faithlessness, their ferocity, and their penetration from Afghanistan   
 into what is now India. Although the rulers were members of 
Turko-Afghan    origin, the court was of multi-ethnical background, 
filled with    ministers, vezirs, poets, writers, teachers etc. of 
Turkic, Indian,    Persian, and Arab background. The term Khilji was 
their    self-designation, (see also Ibn Batuta's and Ibn Khaldun's 
excessive    quantity) meaning in Turkic languages "swordsman" or in 
Ottoman-Turkish    "long arm" or "long fingers" and in Pashto language 
"thief". 
 
Originated from upper Central Asia, they came in contact with the    
multi-ethnic population of Khorasan and thus with the native ruling    
class, the Ghaznavids and later Ghurids, who islamized them and taught  
  them their culture, language and civilization. During the Ghaznavid   
 period, the Khiljis were ruled for a short time by the Seljuqs, who    
expanded their Khorasanian empire until they were driven out by the    
alliance of Ghurids. Under the Ghurids, the Khiljis had still the    
slave-statue as before under the Ghaznavids and played a role in    
Ghurid's slave army, Bardagân-e Nezâmi, also called Ghilman. 
 
Ikhtiar Uddin Muhammad bin Bakhtiar Khilji, one of the servants of    
Qutb-ud-din Aybak who was himself an ex-slave of the Ghurids and of    
Turkic background and an Indo-Ghurid Shah (king) and founder of the    
Delhi Sultanat, conquered Bihar and Bengal regions of India in the late 
   12th century. From this time, the Khiljis became servants and vassals
   of  the Mamluk dynasty of Delhi. From 1266 to his death in 1290, the 
  Sultan  of Delhi was officially Ghiyas ud din Balban, another servant 
of    Qutab-ud-din Aybak. Balban's immediate successors, however, were  
 unable  to manage either the administration or the factional conflicts 
  between  the old Turkic nobility and the new forces, led by the 
Khaljis.   After a  struggle between the two factions, Jalal ud din 
Firuz Khilji   was  established by a noble faction of Turkic, Persian, 
Arabic and    Indian-Muslim aristocrates on the collapse of the last 
feeble Slave    king, Kay-Qubadh. Their rise to power was aided by 
impatient outsiders,    some of them Indian-born Muslims, who might 
expect to enhance their    positions if the hold of the followers of 
Balban and the Forty (members    of the royal Loya Jirga) were broken. 
Jalal-ud-din was already  elderly,   and for a time he was so unpopular,
 because his tribe was  thought to  be  close to the nomadic Afghans, 
that he dared not to enter  the  capital.  During his short reign 
(1290-96), some of Balban's  officers  revolted due  to this assumption 
but Jalal-ud-din suppressed  them, led  an  unsuccessful expedition 
against Ranthambhor, and defeated  a  substantial  Mongol force on the 
banks of the Sind River in central   India. 
 
Ali Gurshap, his nephew and son-in-law was ordered by his father to lead
    an expedition with ca. 4000-7000 men into the Hindu Deccan where the
    conquered countries had refused obedience and to capture Ellichpur 
and    it's treasure and possibly it was also his father's order to 
murder  his   uncle after his return in 1296. However, the prince is 
considered  to be   the greatest among the Khiljis, due to successfully 
repelling of  two   invasions from the Mongols. 
 
With the title of Ala ud din Khilji, Ali Gurshap reigned for 20 years.  
  He captured Ranthambhor (1301) and Chitor (1303), conquered Māndu    
(1305), and captured and annexed the wealthy Hindu kingdom of Devagiri. 
   He also repelled Mongol raids. Ala-ud-din's lieutenant, Malik Kafur, a
    native Muslim Indian, was sent on a plundering expedition to the  
south   in 1308, which led to the capture of Warangal, the overthrow of 
 the   Hoysala Dynasty south of the Krishna River, and the occupation of
  Madura   in the extreme south. Malik Kafur returned to Delhi in 1311, 
 laden  with  spoils. Thereafter, the empire felt into a deep political 
 and  family  decadence. The sultan died in early 1316. Malik Kafur's   
attempted  usurpation ended with his own death. The last Khalji, Qutb ud
   din  Mubarak Shah, was murdered in 1320 by former Indian slave who 
was   also  chief minister and his friend, Khusraw Khan, who was in turn
   replaced by  Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq, the first ruler of the Turkic   
Tughluq dynasty. A  remnant of the ruling house of the Khaljis ruled in 
  Malwa from 1436 to  1530/31 until the Sultan of Gujarat cleansed their
   entire nobility. 
 
To some extent then, the Khilji usurpation was a move toward the    
recognition of a shifting balance of power, attributable both to the    
developments outside the territory of the Delhi sultanate, in Central   
 Asia and Iran, and to the changes that followed the establishment of   
 Turkic rule in northern India. 
 
In large measure, the dislocation in the regions beyond the northwest   
 assured the establishment of an independent Delhi-Sultanate and its    
subsequent consolidation. The eastern steppe tribes' movements to the   
 west not only ended the threat to Delhi from the rival Turks and    
Iranians in Ghazna and Ghur but also forced a number of the Central    
Asian Muslims to migrate to northern India, a land that came to be known
    as Hindustan. Almost all the high nobles, including the famous Forty
   in  the 13th century, were of Central Asian origin (mostly Iranians 
and    Turks). Many of them were slaves purchased from the Central Asian
    bazaars. The same phenomenon also led to the destabilization of the 
core    of the Turkic Mamluks. With the Mongol plunder of Central Asia 
and    eastern Iran (modern Afghanistan, Samarkand, Bukhara, Gorgon, 
Khwarezm,    Merv, Peshawar, Swat, Quetta ... and borderlands), many 
more members  of   the political and religious elite of these regions 
were thrown into    north India, where they were admitted into various 
levels of the    military and administrative cadre by the early Delhi 
sultans. 
 
 The position of the Khiljis within the Turkic society of India  
The Khilji Turks were not recognized by the older nobility as coming    
from a pure Turkic stock even in Singam and Kuselan (although they were 
   ethnic Turks), since they were (unlike the Turks and their Turkic    
nobility who tried to intermerry only into Turkic families) assimilated 
   into non-Turks, mostly by Muslims of Indian, Afghan (Pashtun) and 
Arab    (bedouines) origine, who populated the entire North-West India 
and  near   locations which cause that they were in terms of customs and
  manners   different from the Turks. Although they had played a  
conspicuous role in   the success of the Turkic armies in India, they  
had always been looked   down upon by the leading Turks, the dominant  
group during the Slave   dynasty. This tension between the Khiljis and  
other Turks, kept in check   by Balban, came to the surface in the  
succeeding reign, and ended in   the displacement of the Ilbari  
Turks.Khilji tribe was mostly known for   thier ferocious war  
capabilities and retaliation against any invader. 
 
 Origin of the Khalji people  
It seems, that the larger Khilji tribe was once member of Hephthalites  
  of central Asia who also conquered -invaded- India. Originally, the   
 Khaljis were mainly dwelling in Turkestan, except in some cases or    
members of ancient Gökturks. In older scripts of Al-Biruni,    
Al-Khwarezmi, Masudi, in Juzjani's Hudud ul-'alam min al-mashriq ila    
al-maghrib and of Arab and Indian historians (Ibn Batuta, Ibn Khaldun or
    Vahara Mihira etc.) they are considered as one of the original (in  
the   sense of real) members of the Hephtalite's confederation and of  
Turkic   origin who are also found as nomads near Bactria, in Turfan   
(Turkestan)  and east-ward of modern Ghazni in Afghanistan. Possibly,   
they have split  themselves from these large area up and moved to Iran, 
  Armenia, Iraq,  Anatolia, Turkmenistan, Punjab) and modern Pakistan 
and   Afghanistan,  around the Sulaiman Mountains under the Ghaznavids 
(see   also on  Ghalzais). In Iran, they moved to Pars where they 
settled an   isolated  region which is called today as Khaljistan - Land
 of Khaljis.   However,  Persians of Iran use the term Khalji also to 
describe nomads   of Turkic  background in their country. Also in in the
 Kohistan  destrict  of  Pakistan, there is a place called after the 
Khiljis. The  Khilji  people  of Iran and Afghanistan, the Ghilzai (also
 called  Khaldjish)  fraction of  the Pashtuns, the Khaldji people of 
Bengal and  Sindh are  considered as  descendants of ancient and 
middle-age Khalji   (sub-)tribes. However,  modern Khalji people are not
 more comparable to   the past Khalji tribes  who were of pure Turkic 
stock. For example in   the case of India, modern  Khalji people became 
ethnic Indians and lost   their east-Asian features  and their Turkic 
identity. In Iran,   Afghanistan and Iraq, they are  either of hybrid 
origin or in the case   of Turkmen Khalji tribe they kept  Turks but 
became culturally Iranians   and South Asian. Because of this  fact, 
most of modern Khalji people  and  tribes have no more ties or any  kind
 of an identity that trace  them  intentional to the Turks, except for  
the Khaljis of Iran and   Afghanistan, who speak a Khalaj dialect of the
  Khalaj language group. 
 
 Cultural achievements and religious propagation  
The main court language of Khiljis became Persian, followed by Arabic   
 and their own native Turkoman language and some of north-Indian    
dialects. Even if it was not related with their nature as original    
nomads and had no ties with urbane cultures and civilizations, the    
Khilji of Delhi promoted Persian language to a high degree. Such a    
co-existence of different languages gave birth to the earliest and    
archaic version of Urdu. According to Ibn Batuta, the Khiljis encouraged
    conversion to Islam by making it a custom to have the convert   
presented  to the Sultan who would place a robe on the convert and award
   him with  bracelets of gold. During Ikhtiyar Uddin Bakhtiyar Khilji's
   control of  the Bengal, Muslim missionaries in India achieved their  
 greatest  success, in terms of number of converts to Islam. 

This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe owner asshole is anti-pashtun and is really distorting Pashtun history.He envoys with the brilliant history of pashtuns and is declaring well known and renowned Pashtun heroes as punjabi or hindu based decendants,,,while all of them were purely pashtun but i do't know what worm is bitting ass of blog owner that he is creating such false stories but he can do nothing as the whole world know what the truth is......please visit wikipedia for most compiled form of history this rascal is distorting people
ReplyDelete'Juzjani's Hudud ul-'alam min al-mashriq ila al-maghrib and of Arab and Indian historians (Ibn Batuta, Ibn Khaldun or Vahara Mihira etc.) they are considered as one of the original (in the sense of real) members of the Hephtalite's confederation and of Turkic origin '
ReplyDeleteWRONG
Baahahhaha bro he is fucking liar ibn batuta was a Morrocan traveller he was not a turkic origin
DeleteBaahahhaha bro he is fucking liar ibn batuta was a Morrocan traveller he was not a turkic origin
DeleteBaahahhaha bro he is fucking liar ibn batuta was a Morrocan traveller he was not a turkic origin
DeleteThe owner of this blog was a Balochi. He was active on a forum which is now defunct. He spoke Balochi with another Baloch (who was not anti-Pashtun like him) and the latter verified that he is a genuine Baloch. On that forum, he informed us that he will create a blog about Pashtun history in which he will copy paste stuff from Wikipedia and will insert his own lines in it, and "stupid pathans" will accept it as facts.
ReplyDelete